Which Is Better for Image Writing: Win32 Disk Imager or Etcher?

Users struggle to choose the image editing tool that best suits their needs since so many options are available. We have thus come to assist you by contrasting the two prospects. Open-source software is used in both Etcher and Win32 Disk Imager. With the aid of these software programs, image files and ZIP archives may be stored on USB flash drives and SD cards. 2009 saw the debut of Win32 Disk Imager. The 2016 release of Etcher Balena is the creator of Etcher, which was created and quickly gained popularity because of its user-friendly design and ongoing improvements that made it as stable as possible. Win32 Disk Imager was the focus of a large team of programmers.

The limitation that, at the time, Ubuntu could only be installed on CD drives with this program is overcome by users copying Ubuntu contents onto USB or SD cards. The software was removed when it was no longer required, and the Ubuntu file format was modified. It is possible that the project’s developers gave up on it, although they thought about adapting it to work with standard photo formats and everyday life. The program quickly rose to popularity after receiving a significant upgrade that brought several new features. After that, it’s time to download and set up both programs.

Download/Installation Process :

While the download for the Win32 Disk Imaging system is just 12 megabytes, it is around 125 megabytes for Etcher. Users may easily download software from the official website or another source, and users only need to double-click to install the applications. The application will start immediately when you finish a few simple stages in the installation, which is not at all problematic. The user interface should be the next area of contrast as it is the first thing a user encounters.

Interface :

Win32 Disk Imager has an interface that appears to be from the year 2000 and features several choices that novice users may find challenging to grasp. Concerning Etcher, you most likely won’t find a better user interface in any program, given that it only has three buttons that are simple to operate. Etcher makes it possible for users to burn image files to USB drives without watching any training videos, which users of Win32 Disk Imager might not be able to do. You can quickly tell the difference when you first start using the program.

Process :

Creating an image file using either method requires essentially the same set of procedures. After downloading the operating system image file, you need to place the USB drive or SD card into the computer, launch the program, and then pick the ISO image file. Select the USB disc, and then flash its contents. Etcher makes the process even more straightforward than it seems by breaking it down into just three specific stages. When we discuss Win32 Disk Imager, however, you will see several more choices, which may potentially cause some users to get perplexed. There is an option to hash the data, and a read/write/verify choice, and a check-mark option. In Etcher, all that is shown to you is a trio of buttons. After uploading the ISO, select the flash drive to use and then flash. Everything will be handled automatically by the application.


Both of these programs, as indicated previously, may be used to write picture files and ZIP files onto USB devices and SD cards. Most image writing programs are capable of doing that, but the unique feature of Win32 Disk Imager is that it enables users to make backup files from SD cards. So, you see. A handy device that serves dual purposes. This may be accomplished using the same method. You will then choose the picture file, select your SD card, and click the “Read” button rather than the “Write” option.

Etcher possesses one more useful function, which is that it automatically verifies the image file and checks for any problem that could be present in the ISO file. You can choose “Verify Only” in Win32 Disk Imager, and when you do so, the program will check the checksum of the image file, also known as the file’s integrity. Therefore, it is a manual process in Win32 Disk Imager.

In a matter of seconds :

Compared to Win32 Disk Imager, Etcher will have a faster flash speed, and the difference between the two will range between 30 and 50 percent, depending on the amount of RAM, the size of the hard drive, and the capacity of the USB drive. When burning OS image files to your SD card, you won’t notice much of a change in the flash speed because SD cards are generally sluggish.

Last but not least, the takeaway from this is that both software programs can write picture files into USB devices and SD cards. On the other hand, Etcher can do the task in a more timely and productive manner, and it also features an intuitive user interface, making it an excellent option for novices. If you look at the other features, though, Win32 Disk Imager provides a few other things besides what it already does.

Etcher undergoes periodic updates in response to user feedback that details issues and offers suggestions for improvements. On the other hand, this is not the case with Win32 Disk Imager. The most recent version of Win32 Disk Imager was issued in 2018. Even though multiple problems have been discovered and reported since then, the developers have not provided any new updates or patches. Select this program if you wish to use the Win32 Disk Imager that allows you to back up your files. An etcher is a good option, though, if all you want to do is burn image files to a CD or DVD.

Final Words :

Etcher is a good application that eliminates downloading additional tools to achieve your desired goals. It lets you burn image files to USB drives and SD cards and creates a flash drive without having to go through multiple processes. This is one of the most useful software applications today because of its simplicity, rapidity, and ease of use. Win32 Disk Imager is more potent than Etcher in some ways and offers advanced features for those interested. It is suitable for the novice, but it may cause you to be confused when you look at the interface, even though it has one of the most straightforward user interfaces you will see.

Rate this post
Was this article helpful?

Leave a Comment